Why Roll Calls? a Model of Position-taking in Legislative Voting and Elections

نویسندگان

  • James M. Snyder
  • Michael M. Ting
چکیده

We develop a rationale for position-taking preferences in legislatures using a formal model of legislative vote-buying and elections. In our model, citizens and an interest group are motivated by policy, while legislators are motivated by holding office. The group may attempt to buy legislators’ votes by offering contracts based on their votes. If citizens cannot condition their re-election votes on legislators’ roll calls, then in equilibrium the group will buy its ideal policy and most legislators are voted out of office. If citizens can condition their votes on legislators’ roll calls, then policies are more moderate and more legislators are re-elected. Thus an endogenous preference for position-taking arises in a legislature with public roll calls, and both legislators and citizens will prefer such “open” proceedings ex ante.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Predicting Legislative Roll Calls from Text

We develop several predictive models linking legislative sentiment to legislative text. Our models, which draw on ideas from ideal point estimation and topic models, predict voting patterns based on the contents of bills and infer the political leanings of legislators. With supervised topics, we provide an exploratory window into how the language of the law is correlated with political support....

متن کامل

The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures

T he development and elaboration of the spatial theory of voting has contributed greatly to the study of legislative decision making and elections. Statistical models that estimate the spatial locations of individual decision-makers have made a key contribution to this success. Spatial models have been estimated for the U.S. Congress, the Supreme Court, U.S. presidents, a large number of non-U....

متن کامل

Where You Sit is Where You Stand: The Impact of Seating Proximity on Legislative Cue-Taking∗

This article builds on Matthews and Stimson’s (1975) study of legislative cuetaking, analyzing the extent to which legislators sitting next to each other influence each others’ voting behavior. Data come from three decades of roll call votes in the California Assembly, a chamber in which each member is paired with a deskmate. By comparing deskmate pairs with nondeskmate pairs, I find that legis...

متن کامل

Rebels with a Cause?

Does a Member of the British Parliament’s voting record have any effect on their constituency electoral performance? Scholars have assumed not, else they have tested the proposition with an extremely limited number of roll calls. Congruent with public opinion findings we contend that, paradoxically, voters conditionally reward both ‘party unity’ and ‘independent mindedness’ in their elected rep...

متن کامل

Roll Calls, Party Labels and Elections1

We develop a model of legislative policy-making in which individual legislators are concerned with both policy and re-election. Legislators’ preferences are private information, and they have two means of communicating their preferences to voters. First, they each have a ‘party label’ which credibly identifies an interval within which their ideal points must lie. Second, their roll call votes m...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003